From Paper Trails to Real- Time Fleet Management: Reducing Downtime and Streamlining Operations
Iowa County Wisconsin
Location
Iowa County, WI
Industry
Government
Learn how Collective Data software can help consolidate your data and secure data access—see it in action!
Assets Managed
About Iowa County Highway Department
Located in the heart of Wisconsin, Iowa County is a rural area with a strong commitment to maintaining its infrastructure. The Iowa County Highway Department is tasked with ensuring safe and well-maintained roadways across 700 miles of roads, which is vital for the local economy and the safety of its residents. The department manages a variety of assets, including snowplows, dump trucks, graders, and other heavy equipment necessary for year-round road maintenance.
The Challenge
The Iowa County Highway Department faced significant challenges in managing its diverse fleet of over 300 vehicles and equipment. Their outdated system relied heavily on paper trails for tracking maintenance schedules, work orders, and inventory management. As a result, inefficiencies, increased downtime, and higher operational costs plagued the department, making it difficult to keep up with the demands of maintaining a large network of roads.
As Tammy Fitzsimons, Business Manager, noted: “We were tracking everything by paper trails… It was pretty extreme going from that to the software. But it was great.“
The department needed a comprehensive fleet management solution that could streamline their operations, reduce downtime, and provide real-time data to support better decision-making.
The Solution
To overcome these challenges, the Iowa County Highway Department selected Collective Data’s fleet management software for its flexibility and ability to integrate seamlessly into existing processes. The department saw immediate improvements in their operations. Tammy emphasized the impact, saying: “We saw significant efficiency in our preventative maintenance program for our fleet. Our inventory count went from being a big problem to within 2 to 4% every year, which is incredible.“
Solution Features
- Fleet & Equipment Management
- Automated Preventative Maintenance Scheduling
- Real-time Inventory Tracking and Management
- Work Order Management
- Mobile Data Entry for Field Workers
- Custom Reporting for Budgeting and Fleet Decision-making
- Tracking of Parts and Supplies with Reorder Alerts
- Audit-Ready Inventory Reconciliation
- Task Management with Automated Alerts
- Tracking of Equipment Lifecycles and Maintenance History
Download Our Case Study
Click here to download a sharable version of this case study
Read More Case Studies
City of Fort Lauderdale
Solution: Fleet
Discover how the City of Fort Lauderdale improved asset tracking, efficiency, and accountability with Collective Data’s asset management solution.
Hays County Sheriff’s Department
Solution: Fleet & Quartermaster
Hays County Sheriff’s Department streamlined its asset and fleet management with Collective Data, replacing inefficient spreadsheets with a centralized, scalable system.
Middlesex County
Solution: Fleet
Middlesex County, a New Jersey county government, manages over 2,000 assets, including light and heavy equipment for vehicle and grounds maintenance.
Flagler County Sheriff’s Office
Solution: Quartermaster
The Flagler County Sheriff’s Office streamlined its management of 2,000+ assets by implementing Collective Data’s system, reducing costs, improving visibility, and increasing operational efficiency with real-time tracking and customizable features.
City of Raleigh Police Department
Solution: Quartermaster
The City of Raleigh Police Department manages over 1,700 assets using Collective Data’s inventory management software. This solution streamlined equipment tracking, replaced manual processes, and reduced IT oversight. According to Sr. System Administrator Brian Daniels, it has saved both time and money while improving operational efficiency and accuracy.
Calcasieu Parish Sheriff’s Office
Solution: Quartermaster
CPSO evaluated numerous software before ultimately choosing Collective Data. They found that some did not provide the essentials of what they were looking for and others were overboard with things that we were never going to use. They decided that Collective Data was the right fit for what we are looking to achieve.
